How a Swiss government uses Case Management and CMMN to keep track of parliamentary interventions
Abstract
The processing of parliamentary interventions in a Swiss state (canton) involves many different parties: Parliamentary Services, Government, Ministries, Commissions, etc. In this jurisdiction, it is lawfully required that the government responds to each intervention within precise delays. Additionally, the government must publish an overview of the progress of answering and executing all interventions on a regular basis.
With multiple actors, varying delays and numerous ongoing instances, the government needed a flexible solution to communicate and deliver services to the citizens.
On these bases, the state administration initiated a project to implement a system for keeping track of parliamentary interventions, from their tabling to their classification by parliament after execution. To be able to communicate the courses of action easily and graphically, it was decided to use a model-driven approach. Not only should the models be understandable by all stakeholders, technical or not, but they also needed to be directly implemented on the state administration’s process engine.
At first sight, the processes might have looked like typical linear processes with several parties involved that can be modeled and implemented using BPMN. When diving into the details, it however became clear that it was a better approach to view the intervention as an object (case file) transitioning from one state to another through the occurrence of events or actions triggered by the different process participants, which corresponds to the CMMN view of a process.
In this webinar, we will demonstrate:



Learn how it works
Request DemoConfirm your budget
Request PricingDiscuss your project
Request Meeting
If your Business runs on Rules, it should run on Trisotech!